Entertainment has become a vital part of modern society. It allows us to relax and explore our sense of purpose. It is a necessity in a democracy, but we need to provide access to it in order for it to thrive. This is something a society cannot do without. And the more we have, the better it is for us. In fact, some forms of entertainment are more valuable than others. Here are some examples of those who value entertainment:
John Stuart Mill believed that humans would prefer higher pleasures over lower pleasures. However, the current entertainment industry has proven that he was wrong. In addition to watching bad television, millions of people have experienced both higher and lower pleasures. This is the beauty of a good aspirational philosophy, but it doesn't mean that we should give up entertainment altogether. As long as we're able to engage in the latter, we'll be happy.
In a free society, there's room for both kinds of pleasures
In a democratic society, citizens form strong bonds, which allow them to enjoy a variety of activities. They participate in political parties, civic organizations, and other groups outside of the family. While the former is a good indicator of democracy, the latter is a good indicator of how people think. Regardless of the source of entertainment, it's still necessary.
While Mill's philosophy was good, it has since fallen victim to commercialism and exploitation of the public domain. Entertainment has eroded society's ability to grow and prosper. For a healthy society, the focus is on education. If entertainment is not valued, people will not be able to grow and flourish. In a healthy society, education should be the priority. By the same token, entertainment should be limited to the public realm.
In a free society, the public has the right to choose what it wants, and the media market should serve that purpose. While Mill was largely wrong, he had an excellent aspirational philosophy of life. In the past, entertainment was limited to the movies and the circus. Today, we can watch hundreds of films and television shows. Even a sports game is accessible. Despite this, entertainment has become a necessity for a democratic society.
In an ideal society, people would choose higher pleasures over lower ones
But the current entertainment industry has been a great example of Mill's aspirational philosophy. It is also the most popular form of entertainment. Its audience includes millions of people who have experienced both higher and lower pleasures. Therefore, society cannot do without entertainment. It is essential to a free society to have an educated population. And it is imperative to maintain a democracy that provides the public with education.
In an ideal society, people would choose higher pleasures over lower ones. But the current entertainment industry defies this theory. For example, the audience of bad television shows includes Mill's counterparts. In other words, the audience of a good television show has no aspirational value. In a utopian society, everyone should have the right to enjoy what they want. And that means, the people who love bad TV have a right to watch it.
Entertainment helps us learn. It is a necessity
It is important for us to learn about it. For Mill, higher pleasures are a sign of a well-developed society. Those who don't want to learn about their country's culture should be able to find some form of entertainment that suits their tastes. He can't do without TV. But he can't live without education.
people will always choose higher pleasures over lower ones
But the reality of the entertainment industry does not support this belief. While there are many people who have never seen bad television, it is clear that they have had both types of pleasures. That is why the entertainment industry is the biggest driver of our democracy. Further, it is also a powerful tool for promoting peace in society. The other reason for this argument is that it encourages participation in politics.